Why Use Less than One Instead of Zero CFU during Counting of Microbiology Samples?
There are many reasons for using less than one (<1) cfu instead zero:
Detection Limits
- Microbiological testing methods have a detection limit. For example, when sampling air, surfaces, or products, even if no colonies are detected, it doesn’t guarantee that absolutely no microorganisms are present.
- There might be very low-level contamination that wasn’t captured by the sample.
Sampling Limitations
- Sample Size: Microbiological tests are typically performed on a small portion of the total material (e.g., a small volume of liquid, a limited air volume, or a swabbed area). The fact that no colonies were found in that specific sample doesn’t mean the entire batch or environment is free of microorganisms.
- Microorganisms may not be evenly distributed across a sample, especially at very low concentrations.
False Sense of Security
- Declaring “zero colony” might give a false sense of complete sterility or cleanliness, which could be misleading, especially in environments where sterility is critical (pharmaceutical production or clinical settings).
Risk Management
- By using “<1 CFU,” it allows for a more cautious approach to managing risks related to microbial contamination.
Example:
In a cleanroom where air samples are taken, if an active air sampler processes 1 cubic meter of air and no colonies are detected after incubation, the result is reported as “<1 CFU/m³” rather than “0 CFU/m³.” This means that the air quality is very clean, but it’s still possible (though unlikely) that microorganisms are present at levels below the detection limit of the test.
Read also:
